This week I am going to talk about the economical effects of climate
change in the agricultural sector. Achieving food security is one of the main
goals for the sub Saharan countries governments. Although it is true that the
agricultural output has improved due to the strong political commitment of
investing in small-scale farming (Gathigah, 2012), achieving food security is
becoming harder and harder. Climate change is one of the main reasons why this
is happening. Rainfall volatility, one of the main effects of climate change, “threatens
the production of the 93% of African agriculture that is rainfed” (Werner, K.,2015). Weather related production shortfalls and slow growth in agricultural
production leads to price spikes contributing to food insecurity. Approximately
40% of Sub-Saharan African countries will be “at risk of significant declines
in crop and pasture production due to climate change”(Ludi, 2009). As a
result, millions of people are living under food insecurity that has resulted
in millions of new environmental refugees in East African countries, which have
devastating effects on the host regions (Werner, K.,2015).
The IFDRI (International Food Policy Research Institute) has carried
out a study that assesses the
economy wide effects of the floods and droughts in Malawi.
The study models scenarios for the impacts
of both droughts and floods as well as mitigation options for both. In this
entry I will explain how the study modelled the impacts of droughts and I will
summarise the results in a simplified and clear way and next week that I will
be talking about mitigation opportunities I will talk about the models that
touch this aspect.
--> Introduction
Malawi is a small landlocked African
country suffering frequent droughts and floods. It is their effect on agricultural
production that is most detrimental to food-insecure Malawi. Agriculture and
downstream agropocessing generate half of gross domestic product.
DGE models analyse the effect of droughts
and floods with a focus on the agricultural sector. These models attach also a
statistical probability of occurrence of each given severity. The analysis
doesn't consider infrastructural losses associated with floods or the long-term
implications of extreme weather events, such as the effects of soil erosion or changes
in investment behaviour.
--> Drought and flood risk models
The RMSI models capture two dimensions of
drought and flood impacts: Hazards and risk.
o
Hazard reflects the occurrence of an
extreme climatic event. It is defined by the severity and the probability of an
event’s occurring within a specific time period. Severity is measured in terms
of the return period (RP). This is the expected length of time between
recurrences of two events with similar characteristics. This means that a 1 in
5 year (RP5) is less severe than a RP15. Consequently, events with higher RPs
are also less likely to occur.
o
Risk is the quantification of potential
losses. It depends on the severity of the weather event, the location of the
farmers and the cropping pattern.
The probability of a particular event
occurring can be estimated on the basis of historical data. Production losses
are calculated as the difference between observed production and expected
production.
--> Economywide modelling framework
The following table summarises the
structure of Malawi’s rural economy.
Table 1: Summary statistics by rural farm
households in the economywide model
Small-scale
rural farmers
|
Medium-Scale
rural farmers
|
Big-scale
rural farmers
|
|
Population
(millions)
|
3731
|
6240
|
363
|
Per
capita expenditure (US dollars)
|
121,6
|
130,1
|
203,7
|
Poverty
rate
|
61
|
55,6
|
30,6
|
Average
farm land (ha)
|
0,69
|
1,44
|
8,02
|
--> Maize
|
0,36
|
0,70
|
3,67
|
--> Tobacco
|
-
|
0,03
|
1,79
|
-
Within crop agriculture, maize
and tobacco are by far the most important.
-
Most farmers fall between the
small and large-scale groups. About 55% of this population fall below the
national poverty line, far above the poverty rate of small-scale farms and only
slightly below that of small-scale farms.
--> The
impact of national-level droughts and drought mitigation
·
Main assumptions
- The model includes only a single maize
crop. Calculated by the average maize loss factor for each region using
regional maize crop shares as weights.
- It doesn't consider infrastructural
losses associated with floods
-It doesn't consider the long-term implications of extreme weather events
-It doesn't consider the long-term implications of extreme weather events
- Drought
impacts
The following table shows the economic
impact of droughts on maize and tobacco production and, by extension, on GDP.
The general trend is that the more severe the drought, the larger the estimated
loss in agricultural GDP. Since 2/5 of Malawi’s economy is in agriculture, the
decline in agricultural GDP causes total GDP to fall substantially.
Initial share (%)
|
RP5 drought
|
RP10
|
RP15
|
R25
|
|
Total GDP
|
100
|
-0.53
|
-3.48
|
-7.16
|
-10.42
|
Agriculture
|
40.15
|
-1.12
|
-7.27
|
-14.88
|
-21.53
|
--> Maize
|
10.02
|
-2.12
|
-15.88
|
-34.55
|
-51.24
|
--> Other food crops
|
14.18
|
-0.73
|
-5.33
|
-11.18
|
-16.12
|
--> Livestock
|
2.46
|
-0.45
|
-3.45
|
-7.87
|
-11.33
|
Industry
|
16.47
|
0.002
|
0.03
|
0.25
|
0.72
|
Services
|
43.38
|
-0.20
|
-1.31
|
-2.83
|
-4.36
|
Crop Agriculture
|
|||||
--> Small-scale
|
6.92
|
-1.49
|
-10.62
|
-22.31
|
-32.34
|
--> Medium-scale
|
17.25
|
-1.35
|
-9.43
|
-19.75
|
-28.66
|
--> Large-scale
|
10.24
|
-1.00
|
-4.63
|
-8.13
|
--11.24
|
*The "minus" values are calculated from the difference between the share in each scenario and the initial share
There are 3 main points that can be
extracted from these results:
1)
Agriculture crops in general,
but mainly maize crops are very vulnerable to the severity of droughts. In the
scenario of a 1-in-25 drought, the economic output from agriculture decreases
by almost 22% (more than half of its initial share)
2)
The industry sector is
positively affected by droughts. The reason behind this is that the exchange
rate depreciates to favour exports and therefore, non-agricultural sectors see
the demand for exporting their products increase and their share in GDP
increases too.
3)
Small-scale farmers are the
most affected by droughts. Total earnings generated fall by 32.34%. It is their
grater reliance on maize production that makes smallholder farmers particularly
vulnerable to droughts.
Hi,
ResponderEliminarIt is clear from IFDRI's assessment that maize crops will be most affected and vulnerable to climate change. Hence, as an adaptive strategy farmers can change their crops to drought resistant crops. Are there any problems associated with changing to drought resistant crops for farmers (social, economic, physical ect), what are they? And how likely will drought resistant crops be successful as an adaptive strategy?
The article "Challenges of Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Change in Nigeria: a Synthesis from the Literature" explains that farmers are normally very slow in changing their farming practises to adapt to climate change. Moreover, in Nigeria for example, the government keeps reducing their expenditure in agricultural training and hence, farmers just don't have the capacity to develop and integrate adaptive technology and methods to build resilience against climate change.
EliminarAnd for your second question, there are lots of aspects that need to be taken into account in order for an adaptive strategy to be successful, it is not an easy task. Access to technology, training, markets and public/private funds are the most essential ones in my opinion.
A very good comment from Hong - do reply!
ResponderEliminar